MillionVerifier alternative
MillionVerifier competes hard on price for large files. That is a real advantage, and it is not the only thing on the table.
Published prices
MillionVerifier
$39
for 10,000 credits
BounceIntel
$15
a month for 10,000 credits
MillionVerifier figures from their pricing page, checked September 10, 2026.
Also compared
Short answer
If cost per credit on a large one-off file is the whole decision, MillionVerifier is hard to argue with. BounceIntel is the alternative when you need reason codes, an API on any paid plan and results you can defend.
01Published prices
Only figures each vendor publishes on its pricing page. If they do not list a figure, we say so. Confirm on their site before you buy.
No free credits listed
100 on signup, no card
$39 for 10,000 credits
$15 a month for 10,000 credits
$39 for 10,000 credits
$15 a month for 10,000 credits
$0.00017 per credit
$0.00065 per credit at 1,000,000 a month
No, they stay until you use them
Monthly allotment resets; pay as you go packs do not
Included with paid credits
Issued with any paid plan
| What is compared | MillionVerifier | BounceIntel |
|---|---|---|
| Free credits | No free credits listed | 100 on signup, no card |
| Smallest paid plan | $39 for 10,000 credits | $15 a month for 10,000 credits |
| 10,000 credits | $39 for 10,000 credits | $15 a month for 10,000 credits |
| Lowest listed rate | $0.00017 per credit | $0.00065 per credit at 1,000,000 a month |
| Do unused credits expire? | No, they stay until you use them | Monthly allotment resets; pay as you go packs do not |
| API access | Included with paid credits | Issued with any paid plan |
MillionVerifier figures from their pricing page, checked September 10, 2026.
September 12, 2026
Some tools in this market win on price and are open about it. MillionVerifier is one, and credits that do not expire make it a natural fit for the occasional big clean.
This page is not going to pretend that is a weakness. It is going to be specific about the cases where price per credit stops being the number that decides.
Large files at a low rate, with credits that wait for you. For an annual clean of a marketing database, that combination is genuinely efficient and the arithmetic is easy to check.
The workflow is also simple in a way that matters: upload, wait, download. Simplicity has a real value when the job is occasional and nobody wants to learn a product.
Accuracy claims near a hundred percent should be read carefully, whoever makes them. Catch-all domains accept mail for every local part by design, so certainty is not available from the outside, no matter how the number is presented. What varies between vendors is whether they say that or round it away.
The second place price stops mattering is when you need a verdict you can defend. An agency dropping 12,000 of a client's contacts needs a reason per row. So does anyone whose verification result feeds a compliance process or an audit.
Reason codes and a recommended action come with every verdict, in the dashboard, the CSV and the API response, and the score is a number you can threshold rather than a number to trust.
Our published rate falls with volume and at the top of the catalogue a credit costs a fraction of a cent. We are not claiming to be the cheapest option for a one-off file, because on that specific test we often will not be.
Sample a thousand addresses through both tools on the same day. Then, instead of comparing the totals, compare what you can do with the rows neither tool marked clearly good or clearly bad.
If both leave you equally informed on those rows, buy the cheaper one. That is a real answer and sometimes it is the right one.
02FAQ
On a single large file, often yes. Compare the total for what you will really run in a year, and include what an unexplained row costs you in time, because that is the line where the comparison usually turns.
Pay as you go credits stay until you use them. Monthly plans reset with the billing period, which is what pays for the lower monthly rate.
Not on catch-all domains, because the server accepts every address whether or not the mailbox exists. Any figure that high is either excluding those or guessing at them. We report them as what they are and let you decide.
Yes, included with any paid plan, monthly or pay as you go, with the same response schema as the dashboard and the bulk export.
Credits on signup, no card. Run a random sample of a thousand addresses through both on the same day and compare the unknown column first.
Retention follows your plan and is described in the privacy policy and the data processing agreement, both published on this site. You can delete a job's data yourself rather than waiting for the period to lapse.
Keep comparing
Most shortlists have three names on them. These are the ones that usually sit next to this one.
BounceIntel is worth comparing against EmailListVerify if the cheapest credit is not the whole decision, and you want each row to say why it was flagged rather than only what it was flagged as.
Read the comparisonBounceIntel is a DeBounce alternative for teams that need to explain a verdict, want reason codes in the export, and want an API key without moving up a price tier.
Read the comparisonBouncer and BounceIntel are close in philosophy: European, privacy-forward, focused on verification rather than on a suite. Choose on the shape of the result and the shape of the price list, because that is where they genuinely differ.
Read the comparisonMillionVerifier is a trademark of its owner and is named here only to describe what this page compares. This page is not written, reviewed or endorsed by them, and their plans change, so confirm the current terms on their site before you decide.
Sign up, run a real sample, and hold the verdicts up against whatever you use today.